Pakistan news
Mohammad Asif the prohibited Pakistan quick bowler, has lost Associate in Nursing attractiveness against his conviction within the spot-fixing case that marred Pakistan's tour of European country in 2010.
In their ruling, 3 Court of attractiveness judges in London aforesaid they were "not persuaded that there
square measure any grounds, controversial or otherwise, for assaultive the security of the convictions of this applier [Asif]. The revived applications square measure consequently pink-slipped."
According to Ravi Sukul, Asif's legal counsel in London, the most reason for approaching the Court of attractiveness was that a victorious attractiveness may have influenced the ICC to rethink the ban obligatory on Asif in 2011.
"The attractiveness was against the 2 convictions he had in 2011," Sukul aforesaid. "The 2 convictions to Pine Tree State didn't accord with the legal principles of that specific case. once I scan the case papers I came to the conclusion that the decide World Health Organization was attempting the case might have created some legal technical errors and since of that I took the case to the Court of attractiveness. however the 3 judges World Health Organization were being attentive to the arguments this morning didn't consider Pine Tree State."
Asif, along side his team-mates Salman Butt and Mohammed ruler, had been found guilty of conspiring to bowl deliberate no-balls throughout the Lord's take a look at. Butt was given a 30-month sentence, whereas Asif got twelve months and ruler six. Asif was discharged from jail in might 2012, once serving 0.5 his sentence.
Even before their convictions by the Southwark Crown Court, the ICC had already prohibited the players from any form of recognised cricket. Asif's ban was for 5 years.
Asif and Butt challenged their ICC bans at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in city, Schweiz, however their appeals were rejected in Gregorian calendar month.
In their ruling, 3 Court of attractiveness judges in London aforesaid they were "not persuaded that there
square measure any grounds, controversial or otherwise, for assaultive the security of the convictions of this applier [Asif]. The revived applications square measure consequently pink-slipped."
According to Ravi Sukul, Asif's legal counsel in London, the most reason for approaching the Court of attractiveness was that a victorious attractiveness may have influenced the ICC to rethink the ban obligatory on Asif in 2011.
"The attractiveness was against the 2 convictions he had in 2011," Sukul aforesaid. "The 2 convictions to Pine Tree State didn't accord with the legal principles of that specific case. once I scan the case papers I came to the conclusion that the decide World Health Organization was attempting the case might have created some legal technical errors and since of that I took the case to the Court of attractiveness. however the 3 judges World Health Organization were being attentive to the arguments this morning didn't consider Pine Tree State."
Asif, along side his team-mates Salman Butt and Mohammed ruler, had been found guilty of conspiring to bowl deliberate no-balls throughout the Lord's take a look at. Butt was given a 30-month sentence, whereas Asif got twelve months and ruler six. Asif was discharged from jail in might 2012, once serving 0.5 his sentence.
Even before their convictions by the Southwark Crown Court, the ICC had already prohibited the players from any form of recognised cricket. Asif's ban was for 5 years.
Asif and Butt challenged their ICC bans at the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) in city, Schweiz, however their appeals were rejected in Gregorian calendar month.
No comments:
Post a Comment